Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Jack (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Albert Jack

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Albert Jack
• Articles for deletion/Albert Jack (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Albert Jack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a puff piece for a non-notable author. Created by an obvious SPA, User:WorldNationMedia. See File:AJTemple2.jpg, which is the user's "own work."

Fails GNG with no non-trivial mentions in the included sources. Definitely fails WP:AUTHOR. Obvious WP:PROMO and should be deleted. AlexEng^(TALK) 00:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AlexEng^(TALK) 00:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AlexEng^(TALK) 00:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete, Promotional BLP that doesn't even come close to meeting GNG or NAUTHOR.--🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
• Weak delete He has written a lot of books and garnered a little coverage for them. There is some notability here but not much and probably not enough. The article seems to have been created as a promotional effort although the current content is not egregiously promotional. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

• Weak delete per DanielRigal Nexus000 (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.